RESOURCES

Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment

Download the Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment (15 MB)

After four years of work, the Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment is now complete. This assessment is the most comprehensive evaluation of a large ecoregion ever undertaken, and it includes recommendations for a protected nature reserve that has a good chance of actually saving all native species and their habitats. The process and methods used in the study are part of the science of conservation biology.

Siskiyou Project contracted with Dr. Reed Noss and Dr. Jim Strittholt of the Conservation Biology Institute for the study back in 1995. We needed a vision to help guide our work and we needed a scientifically sound plan to save biodiversity that we could encourage the Forest Service and other land managing agencies to adopt.

The Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment is state-of-the-art science in two respects: first because it compiles massive amounts of data on regional characteristics all in one place; and second because it does something never done before. It uses three separate approaches to analyze the data and then integrates them to arrive at a set of solid recommendations for the conservation of biodiversity.

Strittholt and Noss and other workers from the Conservation Biology Institute (CBI) encountered many challenges in the initial phase of the study, which was to gather data and enter it into a computerized mapping system called GIS (Geographic Information Systems). The data, which came from a variety of different state and federal agencies was of different types, some gathered by remote sensing (from satellites or airplanes) and some from ground surveys. It also came in different forms (vector vs. raster) and was often collected differently in different parts of the region (e.g. vegetation types identified differently in Oregon vs. California). Some of the data layers include: vegetation types, soils and geology, precipitation, roads, sensitive species locations, forest clearcutting locations, and human population. CBI spent many long hours matching these data across state and jurisdictional boundaries before they were ready to do any analysis.

Conservation biologists have three major ways to determine the requirements of conservation:

  1. looking at the needs of focal species like the spotted owl;
  2. mapping "special elements" such as known locations of sensitive species and rare ecosystems; and
  3. selecting a representative portion of each ecosystem type in the region for preservation. The Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment is a synthesis of all of these approaches.

The Northwest Forest Plan for the Spotted Owl is an example of a focal species approach. Because they are carnivores at the top of the food chain, any plan that saves spotted owls would also need to save the entire web of life in the owls' forests. In that way, a carnivore can serve as an umbrella species for many others. Unfortunately, the objectives of the Northwest Forest Plan were more political than biological-in order to meet timber targets, the plan traded off too much of the spotted owl's habitat. Studies show that spotted owl populations are continuing to decline by as much as 4% a year.

CBI used the pacific fisher as a focal species in the Klamath-Siskiyou Conservation Assessment. The fisher needs a combination of low road density and low elevation, so meeting its needs will also meet the needs of a lot of other species which need the same kind of conditions. The assessment also looked at road density as a measure of habitat effectiveness for other carnivores like bears, cougars, wolverines, and some day, the wolf. These species all have large home ranges and need large roadless areas with roadless connection corridors to other roadless areas so they can move about the landscape unmolested to feed and breed.

The second approach used was to map different types of special elements so they could be included in the final recommendation for protected areas. These elements were: threatened and endangered species, old growth forests, serpentine geology (with its concentrations of rare plants), watersheds free of the deadly Port Orford cedar disease, and watersheds with strong salmon runs.

The third approach was to find a way to represent a portion (25% was the target) of every ecosystem type in the ecoregion in a protected area. The Klamath-Siskiyou is a highly diverse region with a fine mosaic of different vegetation communities and geological substrates spread out across the landscape. This diversity is what makes it a globally outstanding ecoregion. By combining plant community types (e.g. doug fir forest, jeffrey pine forest, oak woodland, mixed chaparral, wetland) with geological and climate types, CBI identified 215 different ecosystem types in the ten million acre Klamath Siskiyou ecoregion.

The final task in the Conservation Assessment was to put it all together. CBI used roadless areas of 1000 acres and greater as the basic building blocks for the assessment. There are 590 of these roadless areas in the Klamath-Siskiyou. Each roadless area was mapped and assessed for its conservation potential. Did it contain a lot of special elements? Did it have a high value of habitat effectiveness for carnivores? Which ecosystems were represented in it?

In the final analysis, the Conservation Assessment recommends protecting most of the remaining roadless areas in a reserve system. Some additional land needs to be protected to connect up roadless areas or because it contains special elements. This amounts to about 50% of the ecoregion, all on public land. 62% of the ecoregion is publically owned and managed by Forest Service or BLM. A small additional fraction of private land is recommended for protection, but only voluntary measures like conservation easements and purchases from willing sellers are advocated. The Conservation Assessment also makes recommendations to end all cutting of old growth trees and to actively manage the new protected areas to heal past damage from roads and clearcuts.

The Conservation Assessment concludes that protecting the remaining roadless areas as the core of a reserve system can achieve most of the conservation goals for the Klamath-Siskiyou region. This conclusion is significant - before the study, we did not know if there was enough intact wild land left in public ownership to save the extraordinary biodiversity of the Klamath-Siskiyou. Now we know there is.
 


If you would like a copy of a CD with the full report, color maps and GIS data layers (ESRI Arcview software required), please send your request along with $20 to: Siskiyou Project, 9335 Takilma Rd, Cave Junction, OR 97523. You can also download the full text of the report below and four of the color maps.

Warning: These files are quite large and make take hours to download on slow connections!

View low resolution versions of a sample of maps.

Study Area
Roadless Areas
Habitat Types
Dominant Vegetation Types

Download full resolution maps of the:

Study Area (2.9 mb)
Roadless Areas (1.9 mb)
Habitat Types (1 mb)
Dominant Vegetation Types (6 mb)

 
Signup!

Home | Top of Page